The 10-Page Torture Test
June 12, 2025, 01:47 PM *
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
News: tenpagetorturetest at gmail dot com
 
   Home   Help Search Chat Login Register  
Pages: [1]   To Page Bottom
  Print  
Author Topic: Fair Use and Toeing the Invisible Line  (Read 3644 times)
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Pitchpatch
Rollercoaster on fire
Administrator
Mugwump
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 757



« on: February 10, 2011, 11:03 AM »

If you rely on Fair Use when posting copyrighted material on this site, it's up to you to decide how thoroughly that section of copyright law protects you.

For example, it's my belief that producing a 10PTT from ten pages of a 'for your consideration' screenplay published by a studio on its website can be reasonably considered Fair Use.  But there's no way to know for sure. Only a judge can make that call.

Fair Use is a smokey, lumpy, shifting realm of law, continuously eroded by the corporations with the biggest dogs in the fight.  It feels like those corporations want copyright law to mean perpetual ownership and exclusivity for all time.

The English Parliament wanted copyright to be: "An Act for the Encouragement of Learning, by vesting the Copies of Printed Books in the Authors or purchasers of such Copies...” and to encourage "learned men to compose and write useful books."

Additionally, the enacting of the Statute of Anne in 1710 introduced the concept of the ‘public domain’ for books.  No longer were books owned by authors and printers forever. More here.

So nowadays copyright is supposed to benefit the creator, but not perpetually.  Copyright is supposed to ensure society eventually benefits from individual creation. Kind of like patent law -- another now-abused form of legal protection.  First the individual profits; then, after a time, society reaps the rewards.

With corporations fighting hard to erode the protections offered by Fair Use, these days you can’t assume anything.

All authors and creators should take time to understand what Fair Use might or might not cover.  One of the best explanations I’ve read is this article by Jonathan Bailey.  Summarizing:

  • The most important thing is transform the material. Your use must create something new.  You can’t just blandly republish the original.
  • The second most important thing is, your use must not harm the original work’s potential market.
  • Fair Use provisions apply much less to unpublished works. Author’s have the right to control first appearance of their work.
  • Generally, the less of the whole you use, the safer you are.  But what you use is more telling. Use a small but essential part of another’s work and the shield of Fair Use shrinks dramatically.
  • Altruistic use of the original material can count in your favor. Flagrant or outrageous use can count against you.

It’s always, always better to remove all doubt and seek permission to use pages for the purposes of a 10PTT. But of course that’s not always possible or practical.  In those circumstances you need to hold high confidence that you stand within the hazy but discernible boundary of Fair Use.

This article is not legal advice. Use your best judgment or talk to a professional.
« Last Edit: December 23, 2012, 08:15 AM by Pitchpatch » Logged

NTSF:SD:SUV::
Pitchpatch
Rollercoaster on fire
Administrator
Mugwump
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 757



« Reply #1 on: March 21, 2011, 12:59 AM »

http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2011/mar/18/righthaven-loses-second-fair-use-ruling-over-copyr/

An example of fair use, upheld by a judge, where a website reposted without permission an entire Las Vegas Review-Journal story.  Note the very particular elements that had to be satisfied.
Logged

NTSF:SD:SUV::
120pages
Guest
« Reply #2 on: March 21, 2011, 05:37 PM »

I have long suspected that script analysis on a website would activate Fair Use for posting scripts.  Especially if the web site were clearly dedicated to studying writing, and the analysis and discussion included both publicly available and private works.

The participants would have to provide analysis and discussion, like a seminar, demonstrating that sharing the script was necessary for informational rather than entertainment purposes.

I'm not a lawyer, that's just my screwball opinion.

(Think about this though: a person with such a website could pick a script whose rights were controlled by a writer with little money or standing. (Thus fewer lawyers.)  They could then petition the Court to make a ruling that their critique site was Fair Use, on the basis of informational value, and the scripts were unavailable commercially.  If the Court ruled in their favor, then they would be free to post other scripts from larger companies.)

Just a thought.
Logged
Pitchpatch
Rollercoaster on fire
Administrator
Mugwump
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 757



« Reply #3 on: March 22, 2011, 12:11 AM »

Not harming the work's value in the marketplace is the key.

If you publish the whole thing unauthorized then you're likely harming the work/author.  You've undermined the owner's ability to control the work.

If you publish a small part unauthorized (more than reasonable review quotations) and say negative things about it then you're likely harming the work/author.

So publishing any part of an unproduced script is in most cases infringing.

For produced scripts, if you're just republishing the scripts without adding educational commentary -- as on MyPDFScripts, predominantly -- then IMO you're almost certainly infringing.  If each script on MyPDFScripts were published verbatim only with an accompanying review then Sheridan would have a stronger Fair Use claim, I think.
Logged

NTSF:SD:SUV::
Sibo
Guest
« Reply #4 on: March 30, 2011, 09:47 AM »

Anyone know what's happened to mypdf screenplays. I keep getting it's exceeded its bandwidth. Is this a glitch or something more sinister?
Logged
Pitchpatch
Rollercoaster on fire
Administrator
Mugwump
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 757



« Reply #5 on: March 30, 2011, 09:58 AM »

Looks innocuous enough.  Exactly as it says.  Sheridan pays for hosting with a certain quota of bandwidth (up and down), and that quota was reached.  Maybe folks started downloading like crazy out of fear the site will disappear soon.
Logged

NTSF:SD:SUV::
Jawbreaker
Guest
« Reply #6 on: March 30, 2011, 10:53 AM »

I think it's only a matter of time before it gets shutdown.  Even Done Deal is stopping all discussion regarding script trading and whatnot.  It's all going underground.
Logged
Pitchpatch
Rollercoaster on fire
Administrator
Mugwump
*****
Offline Offline

Posts: 757



« Reply #7 on: April 02, 2011, 03:43 PM »

T&J said: "It's just bandwidth.  Sheridan tweeted about it yesterday.  Even if it does get shut down the non-script content will remain as I have did a lot of work for it and I will make sure that the interviews and articles I wrote are up on some site to help writers out."

(Split his post re Nashville Screenwriters Conference to a new topic)
Logged

NTSF:SD:SUV::
Pages: [1]   Back To Top
  Print  
 
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF | SMF © Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!
Page created in 0.019 secs [21]